-
Website
http://www.gilroydispatch.com -
Original page
http://www.gilroydispatch.com/news/252346-santa-clara-county-challenges-prop-8 -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
zapman95020
60 comments · 1 points
-
20Yanks09
105 comments · 7 points
-
Dennis_Taylor
46 comments · 3 points
-
gilroymom
45 comments · 2 points
-
RLK
860 comments · 5 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
GilroyDispatch.com | Mountain lion suspected in death of sheep and goat
1 day ago · 27 comments
-
GilroyDispatch.com | Bare-all online profiles raise questions of privacy
6 days ago · 79 comments
-
GilroyDispatch.com | Hollister council rebuffs change of zoning for pot club
19 hours ago · 5 comments
-
GilroyDispatch.com | $37K for MediLeaf legal fees
1 day ago · 9 comments
-
GilroyDispatch.com | Honda dealership coming to Morgan Hill
17 hours ago · 3 comments
-
GilroyDispatch.com | Mountain lion suspected in death of sheep and goat
lol And as i recall in the bible it tells a story about Adam & Eve,not Adam & Steve.
Please punch yourselves for me. It's truly appreciated. Thanks
I'm a gay man and I've always been. I've never been with a woman and nothing could be grosser to me. If I want loose meat in my face, I'll go to Arby's. And I deserve to have the same companionship, legal protection, and legal wording as anyone who was born straight.
Being gay isn't about sex kids, but it just shows that ignorance that Christians have when they reduce a relationship based on sacrafice, companionship, monogomy, and love, to butt sex.
Grow up! You're ruining peoples lives with your lack of intelligence.
They already claimed the ban is an impedement to onbes right to pursue happinesss but the court ruled that marraige is not an automatic gateway to bliss and happiness and cited many cases of unhappy married couples.
The pro gay marraqige crowd has already lost using tyhat as the basis for their cause of action.
Marraige is not a requirement to pursuing happiness and absent any real damages, they have no case.
That is where the courts stand on that.
The only exception is the lone CA SC decision that is not backed by any precedent.
As long as gays can power of attorney these rights, they are not being denied the right to pursue happiness.
The county will lose this case.